FAQs

Why Direct Bill? (Item 3, Proposal to Direct Bill Active Clergy Pension Costs)

First, to take the pension and benefit costs out of the apportionments so that our apportionment giving can be more clearly addressed to mission. Second, since the current pension plan is based on compensation, not years of service, to place the responsibility for pension on the local church where compensation is determined.

What will Direct Billing do? (Item 3, Proposal to Direct Bill Active Clergy Pension Costs)

It will make transparent the full cost for each clergy placement. That will allow for more fully informed missional personnel decisions.

What will Direct Billing not do? (Item 3, Proposal to Direct Bill Active Clergy Pension Costs)

It will not prevent us from helping churches in missional situations. We will do that through apportioned giving for equitable compensation, emerging congregations, special missional compensation, and ethnic minority congregations.

Isn't it reasonable and to be expected that financially successful churches should subsidize other churches? (Item 3, Proposal to Direct Bill Active Clergy Pension Costs)

There are many assumptions in this question that need to be examined: about what is "reasonable," "expected," "financially successful," and the manner of appropriate "subsidization." We have been doing it this way – accepting many unexamined assumptions. I know of no churches that have extra money that could not be used for mission. The question is: Is the best way to do mission by subsidizing pension costs in more than 200 churches in this Conference?

What exactly are we voting on? (Item 8, Resolution Regarding the Number of Districts)

The Annual Conference decides the number of districts. We currently have 7; the petition asks for 4.

Who decides where the districts lines are? Who decides how many offices there are and where the offices are located? Who decides how many superintendents there are?(Item 8, Resolution Regarding the Number of Districts)

The Bishop, in consultation with the Cabinet, makes those decisions. The Annual Conference has authority only for the number of districts.

What are the benefits of 4 districts instead of 7?(Item 8, Resolution Regarding the Number of Districts)

Having 4 districts will enable the Conference to have more efficient and consistent Conference-wide communication and coordination. This past year there were 5 superintendents who were responsible for 7 districts. This year there will be 4 district superintendents, and adoption of this proposal would mean there would be 1 superintendent per district.

Is this just about money?(Item 8, Resolution Regarding the Number of Districts)

No. The number of districts doesn't directly translate into cost savings. The Bishop and Cabinet determine how to administer the Conference via the districts, and costs are impacted by factors such as office rental, operating expenses, materials distribution, and staffing.

Are there organizational plans that are coming and if so, what do they have to do with the reduction in district proposal?(Item 8, Resolution Regarding the Number of Districts)

The number of districts is the only matter that is before the Annual Conference.

 

However, plans are in place to make use of funds for superintendent-level positions for Leadership Development and for Ministry Effectiveness – including New Churches and Church Revitalization. In addition, pastor and church records will be converted to electronic media this summer. This will allow each superintendent to have access to information, regardless of where he or she is. No longer will a DS be dependent upon being physically present in an office in order to review documents.

 

It is important to remember that the supervision task is different from mission development. Technology advances in the past few years have made meetings and some supervisory tasks less dependent upon driving distances. Mission development will be shared with the circuits and lay leadership.

Why these changes to the minimum salary rules? (Item 14, Recommendation to Change Minimum Compensation Rules)

In our conference, for a number of years there has been a formula in the conference standing rules to calculate the minimum salary. The formula has been a fixed percentage of the conference average cash salary, adjusted by years of service. Over time, some aspects of this formulaic approach have become outdated, practices have grown up in using the formula that have had unintended consequences, and the rigidity of the formula has reduced flexibility that is needed in tough economic times.

What will the changes do? (Item 14, Recommendation to Change Minimum Compensation Rules)

The proposed changes eliminate the use of a formula and, instead, require the Equitable Compensation Commission annually to recommend a dollar amount to be the minimum salary for pastors in full connection and, separately, a dollar amount to be the minimum salary for pastors not in full connection.

What won't these changes do? (Item 14, Recommendation to Change Minimum Compensation Rules)

The proposed changes in the standing rules will not, in and of themselves, establish any particular minimum salary level for the annual conference. They will only change the process by which the minimum salary is set: from a formula to an annual deliberation.

Shouldn't seniority be taken into consideration in setting clergy salaries? (Item 14, Recommendation to Change Minimum Compensation Rules)

The thought is that local churches, as a matter of equity, should be taking years of service into consideration in establishing the salary level, but that the barebones minimum isn't a number that needs to be adjusted for seniority.

What confusion and misunderstanding are addressed by these rule changes? (Item 14, Recommendation to Change Minimum Compensation Rules)

The confusion and misunderstanding has to do with some items that are not directly addressed by the rules, such as whether health insurance is to be provided for just the pastor or for the entire family. The rules don't say, and so there is confusion about what the obligation of the local church is, and about what the entitlement is. This is to be corrected by moving away from a rigid formula in the standing rules to a promulgation each year of exactly what the number is for the minimum compensation, and exactly what benefits are to be provided.

What is Annual Conference Session?

A long time ago the founder of our church, John Wesley, felt that it was important for his preachers to get together regularly for prayer and Bible study. He called this "holy conferencing." Annual Conference Session is nothing like it was during Mr. Wesley's day. We gather to hear of the dynamic ministries that are happening throughout our Church, and we also have to do business stuff as well, such as setting our financial budget for the next year and electing people to serve on Conference agencies to do the work of the Conference. But the Annual Conference Session still places a high priority on worship and that thing called holy conferencing. And youth delegation places a high priority on doing this worship and conferencing with a ton of passion for Jesus Christ!

Why are young adults important at Annual Conference?

Young people are an important part of the Church of today. Without young people participating as delegates to Annual Conference Session no one can hear our concerns, our hopes, and our dreams for the future of The United Methodist Church.

Without the young adult delegation the Annual Conference Session would be a much more serious place. The young adults, along with the youth delegation, are some of the people who teach the Annual Conference that the Church is exciting and can be about changing the world in the spirit of Christ! 

It is the vision of Bishop Brown that young people be recognized and participate at all the "tables" where we gather to talk about and plan for the ministry of our Church in creating disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world!

Besides attending business and worship sessions, what else do youth do at Annual Conference Session?

One of the things you must have to be a young adult delegate is a desire to be in fun fellowship with a whole lot of people. It is our hope that the young adult delegation would have time to connect, talk, and discuss the business and vision of the Annual Conference. The other "bonus" about conference is that you meet people from other places and churches other your own. It confirms in us this unique connection we have as United Methodists.

 

One of the highlights for the Young Adult Delegation is our opportunity for evening time together. We usually share meals together at one of the area restaurants. While we are in Sacramento, we hope to have opportunities to be together outside of the official gatherings of the conference.

What are the qualifications for being a Young Adult Delegate?

In order to attend Annual Conference Session you must be willing to make a commitment to your time at there. We, as young adult delegates, must attend all meetings, and they can get very long and controversial. When attending Annual Conference Session you are representing your local church and the young people of this Conference. It also helps to have a strong backside for all the sitting you will do, although there will be opportunities for breaks during ACS and we hope to have an area for you to gather and connect during those breaks.

So … you can be a young adult delegate to Annual Conference Session if you are:
  • over the age of 18, but are 30 or younger;
  • a committed, active Christian;
  • interested in learning more about the workings of The United Methodist Church;
  • willing to be a voice for young people's concerns in our Annual Conference and in the Church.
Standing Rules allows us to have two (2) voting members from each district.